Firstly, apologies for not blogging sooner. Been a busy few weeks.
So, the RPS Distinctions Advisory Day, what was it like? In a word : Awesome
The day started with informal chat and introductions. It was great to meet some of the people with whom I had previously exchanged emails, and put some faces to names. Everybody was very kind and welcoming, and reassuring (I was very nervous). There were about 40 people there in total, about 25 of whom were showing prints or slides, and the rest of whom were either judging, organising, or spectating.
I was informed that I would be the fifth person of the day, so I took a seat near the front and waited for things to get started.
The day started with each of the ‘judges’ (Vanessa, Nick and Tom) talking about what they are looking for when assessing L, A and F panels, as well as an introduction from the organizors. This was an interesting insight into what is expected of applicants in terms of technical quality, visual awareness and presentation. We then progressed onto viewing each of the participants panels. As each person was called, their images were placed on a stand at the front, lit by two powerful lights to give a clear and bright view of the images. Once the images were displayed to the participant’s satisfaction, the judges each took a turn in discussing the panel. They were able to make suggestions about presentation and ‘panelling’, as well as technical quality of individual images, and help identify the stronger and the weaker images for each panel.
This feedback was fascinating and a source of excellent information – regardless of who’s panel was being discussed. I took several pages of notes from the day. I found the advice to be both honest and critical, as well as supportive and encouraging. All of the judges found the time to speak to individuals during the breaks to provide further feedback and support.
I put forward the first panel below, along with four ’spare’ images. I was aware that as printed images, the 2nd and 4th on the top row were technically weaker than others, as they were a little soft in the main point of focus. Vanessa noted this immediately, which confirmed my suspicion that I should consider replacing these, although she suggested perhaps image 4 (dandelions) could be reshot if possible. She also made positive comments on my ’spare’ image of the 3 Giraffes.
As well as the feedback and information from the experts, the other highlight of the day for me was seeing so many fantastic panels, particularly the A and F panels on display. It provided a real insight as to what is required for the A and F distinctions, and how to start on the path towards these. I came away inspired and motivated, and with a much clearer understanding of what will happen on the L Assessment day (and, I think, of what is required of me as an L applicant).
It was an exhausting day, but well worth it – I can thorougly recommend an advisory day to anybody considering applying for a Licentiate.
